default_mobilelogo

Article text>>>

 

Tetiana Cherednychenko - Senior Lecturer at the Department of Psychology of Activity in Special Conditions, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Cherkasy (Ukraine)

ORCID 0000-0001-5496-1083

 

Nelia Vovk - PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology of Activity in Special Conditions, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Cherkasy (Ukraine)

ORCID 0000-0001-6601-7030

 

 DOI - https://doi.org/10.52363/dcpp-2026.1.7

 

Keywords: posttraumatic growth, combat participants, psychological trauma, personal resources, social support, determinants of development.

 

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the problem of posttraumatic growth of combat participants and systematizes the main determinants of its development. The relevance of the study is обусловлена the increasing number of individuals who have experienced the impact of combat and psychotraumatic events under conditions of the full-scale war in Ukraine, as well as the need to reorient psychological science from studying only the negative consequences of trauma to investigating the potential of the individual for recovery and development after crisis experiences. The purpose of the article is to identify key factors that contribute to the formation of posttraumatic growth in combat participants. The essence of the functional-descriptive model of posttraumatic growth by R. Tedeschi and L. Calhoun is revealed, and five basic manifestations of posttraumatic growth are characterized: improvement of interpersonal relationships, discovery of new opportunities, personal strengthening, spiritual-existential changes, and appreciation of life. It has been established that the determinants of posttraumatic growth have a multilevel character and can be grouped into three categories.

Individual-psychological determinants include personality traits, optimism, self-efficacy, locus of control, cognitive flexibility, the ability to make meaning of traumatic experience, and constructive coping strategies. Socio-psychological factors include social support, cohesion,

social recognition, support from family and significant others, as well as spiritual and religious resources. Situational-demographic factors include age, gender, social status, intensity and duration of combat experience, as well as characteristics of traumatic circumstances. It is concluded that posttraumatic growth is the result of the interaction between internal personal resources and external conditions of the social environment. A перспективним direction for further research is defined as the empirical study of the specifics of determinants of posttraumatic growth in combat participants.

 

Referenses

  1. Zubovskyi, D. (2018). Struktura proiavu osobystisnoho zrostannia uchasnykiv ATO u posttravmatychnyi period [Structure of the manifestation of personal growth of ATO participants in the post-traumatic period]. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. Dalia, 3(47), 177–188. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Klymchuk, V. (2020). Psykholohiia posttravmatychnoho zrostannia [Psychology of post-traumatic growth]. Kropyvnytskyi: Imeks-LTD. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Oleh Kokun, & Melnychuk, T. (2023). Rezyliiens-dovidnyk: praktychnyi posibnyk [Resilience handbook: practical guide]. Kyiv: Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Oleh Kokun, Pishko, I., Lozinska, N., & Oliinyk, V. (2023). Teoretychni osnovy posttravmatychnoho zrostannia viiskovosluzhbovtsiv – uchasnykiv boiovykh dii [Theoretical foundations of post-traumatic growth of military personnel participating in combat operations]. Kyiv: TOV «7BTS». [in Ukrainian].
  5. Lazos, H. (2016). Posttravmatychne zrostannia: teoretychni modeli, novi perspektyvy dlia praktyky [Post-traumatic growth: theoretical models and new perspectives for practice]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy, 1(45), 120–127. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Osodlo, V., & Zubovskyi, D. (2017). Posttravmatychne zrostannia osobystosti uchasnykiv boiovykh dii: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy [Post-traumatic personal growth of combat participants: current state and prospects]. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal, 1(3), 63–79. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Christopher, M. (2004). A broader view of trauma: a biopsychosocial-evolutionary view of the traumatic stress response in the emergence of pathology and/or growth [Shyrshyi pohliad na travmu: biopsykhosotsialno-evoliutsiine bachennia reaktsii travmatychnoho stresu u vynyknnenni patolohii ta/abo zrostannia]. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 75–98. [in English].
  8. Evers, A., Kraaimaat, F., Langveld, W., Jongen, P., Jacobs, J., & Bijlsma, J. (2003). Beyond unfavorable thinking: The Illness Cognition Questionnaire for chronic diseases [Poza mezhamy nehatyvnoho myslennia: opytuvalnyk kohnitsii shchodo khvoroby pry khronichnykh zakhvoriuvanniakh]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 1026–1037. [in English].
  9. Henson, C., Truchot, D., & Canevello, A. (2021). What promotes post traumatic growth? A systematic review [Shcho spryiaie posttravmatychnomu zrostanniu? Systematychnyi ohliad]. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 5(4), 100195. [in English].
  10. Ronnie Janoff-Bulman (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Three explanatory models [Posttravmatychne zrostannia: try poiasniuvalni modeli]. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 30–34. [in English].
  11. Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review [Pozytyvni zminy pislia travmy ta nespryiatlyvykh obstavyn: ohliad]. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11–21. [in English].
  12. Peterson, C., Park, N., Pole, N., D’Andrea, W., & Martin Seligman (2008). Strength of character and posttraumatic growth [Syla kharakteru ta posttravmatychne zrostannia]. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21, 214–217. [in English].
  13. Pietrzak, R., Goldstein, M., Malley, J., Rivers, A., Johnson, D., Morgan, C., & Steven Southwick (2010). Posttraumatic growth in veterans of operations enduring freedom and Iraqi freedom [Posttravmatychne zrostannia u veteraniv operatsii “Enduring Freedom” ta “Iraqi Freedom”]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 126(1), 230–235. [in English].
  14. Richard G. Tedeschi, & Lawrence G. Calhoun (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence [Posttravmatychne zrostannia: kontseptualni osnovy ta empirychni dokazy]. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. [in English].
  15. Tsai, J., Sippel, L., Mota, N., Steven Southwick, & Pietrzak, R. (2016). Longitudinal course of posttraumatic growth among US military veterans: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study [Dovhotryvalyi perebih posttravmatychnoho zrostannia sered veteraniv armii SShA: rezultaty doslidzhennia National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study]. Depression and Anxiety, 33(1), 9–18. [in English].
  16. Zoellner, T., & Maercker, A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology: A critical review and introduction of a two component model [Posttravmatychne zrostannia v klinichnii psykholohii: krytychnyi ohliad i predstavlennia dvokomponentnoi modeli]. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 626–653. [in English].

 

Date of initial submission of the article to the journal: 20.04.2026

Date of acceptance of the article for publication after peer review: 18.05.2026

Date of publication of the article: 31.05.2026

 

Publisher National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, 2026

This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en

 

How to cite: Cherednychenko T., Vovk N. Determinants of posttraumatic growth of combat participants. Disaster and Crisis Psychology Problems. 1(11). 2026. P. 86-96. https://doi.org/10.52363/dcpp-2026.1.7

 

Issue 1(11)-2026

joomla3x